| SPEAKERS CORNER by
Paul Messenger
We are constantly being told by the know-nothing
mass media that we are moving into an era where our traditional forms
of music software will be replaced by internet downloading. Forgive my
scepticism, but twenty years ago those same pundits promised us that vinyl
would be dead by 1990, and look what happened to that prediction.
Our relationship with our music is a complex
affair. Sure, downloading is quick, convenient, potentially inexpensive,
and is already establishing itself as a popular alternative to traditional
media. And as internet access rates and computer storage capacities go
on rising, higher resolution downloads with less or no compression will
become increasingly viable and hopefully available. But the simple fact
that these don’t involve a real physical object will, in my opinion,
always alienate enough customers to ensure that the ‘harder forms
of software’, such as vinyl and CD, will continue to co-exist.
Let’s take a moment to consider the
attributes of the various music storage media. Despite being relatively
bulky and susceptible to damage, vinyl has survived for more than half
a century. That in itself is a uniquely impressive achievement, which
gives great confidence to anyone who believes a record collection is for
life, not just the next few months. Add in the observations that it still
potentially offers the best sound quality, and comes in a physically attractive
format with its own ‘poster’ on the front, and it’s
difficult to see any alternative format taking its place, except of course
on convenience grounds.
The first successful attempt to do this
was of course Philips’ Compact Cassette, born in the mid-1960s and
making a serious bid for stardom a decade later, when vinyl was going
through a particularly rough patch. One of the cleverest features of the
cassette was that it was the same size as a pack of playing cards, whose
ease of handling had evolved as a biological match for the human body
through millennia. Compact, record-capable, portable and inherently free
from surface noise (aided and abetted by Mr Dolby’s clever noise
reduction system), there was a time when the cassette looked like a serious
contender. But where is it now? Mass duplication was always a problem,
and pre-recorded examples never matched up to the quality obtainable with
real-time home recording. Unlike vinyl, longevity wasn’t a cassette
trait, and it seemed to disappear almost before CD got going, apart from
some residual in-car use. Somehow it never even got close to vinyl’s
long-term collectability, more pretender than contender.
Although the little 120mm Compact Disc
became an immediate style icon, sales didn’t really get going properly
until the late 1980s, due to high initial prices of both software and
hardware. Silent backgrounds were particularly appreciated by classical
music listeners, and convenience features like remote control, track skipping
and a playing time of more than an hour all served to make it the prime
music carrier throughout the 1990s, while the addition of record capability
has helped it keep up with the game in the current decade. Fears that
the data on CDs would eventually start to deteriorate seem to have abated,
but the packaging has always proved troublesome – I don’t
know anyone who actually likes the wretched ‘jewel case’;
the card-based alternatives don’t seem much better; and the sleeve
notes are always much too small for easy reading.
That sales of regular music CDs have been
declining in the last couple of years is well documented, but they’re
doing so from a historic high, and the picture is a very muddy one, due
to the parallel growth in ‘legal’ and ‘illegal’
downloading, and of copying.
There still seems every reason to believe
that the 120mm optical disc has the potential to provide long term archive
storage for music albums in CD form, and movies as DVDs. But there remains
the lurking worry that the medium is still evolving, which inevitably
leads to concerns over long term stability, less perhaps of the disc format
than of the hi-tech replay hardware involved. For example, many of the
multipurpose chips being developed today are primarily low voltage/consumption
types, developed very much with the massive mobile phone sector in mind,
and are therefore likely to be less suited to high quality audio applications
than previous generations of chips.
Long-term stability is really the core
strength of the vinyl disc. It did go through a number of changes in the
early days, with variations in the equalisation curves adopted by different
record companies, as well as some alternative disc sizes and rotation
speeds, as well as the major shift from mono to stereo. But those uncertainties
are long past, and apart from the occasional 12-inch 45rpm single, vinyl
today has a format stability and permanence unmatched by other media.
It’s pretty obvious that hi-res downloading
represents one of the futures for hi-fi, not only because of the technological
determinants of increasing internet speeds and computer memory capacities,
but probably more significantly because it will become cheaper to deliver
(though not necessarily purchase), while the cost of ‘hard’
software will continue to rise. (We’ve already seen bulky, heavy
vinyl become significantly more costly than the CD equivalent, reversing
the situation that existed back in the 1980s.)
Many of us will doubtless be happy enough
to settle for ‘virtual’ downloaded software, storing it on
our computers or servers. But the computer on which I’m writing
this might be the first I’ve used for music storage, but it’s
my fifth computer in eighteen years, and three at least are long gone.
It may well be that my music files will happily transfer to the sixth,
seventh and so on to the tenth in fifteen or twenty years time, but I
certainly don’t feel as confident about their future as I do about
my forty year old vinyl discs.
Top | Back
to Last Page |