|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Issue 10 - March 2001 |
||
|
Their approach is most obvious with the Planar 2 and 3 turntables, and most spectacularly so with the RB300 tonearm. No sooner had SME produced the Series 5 with its onepiece precision cast armtube and four figure price ticket, than Rega joined the party at around a tenth of the price! The rest as they say is history. Of course, the two products are far from identical, the Rega eschewing even VTA adjustment in pursuit of better value (a decision that makes considerable sense in the context of the company's own turntables and cartridges but which has left the rest of the analogue fraternity pulling its hair out) but it's impossible to ignore the outstanding performance on offer at a bargain price. Ever wondered why nobody makes mid-price tonearms any more? Nowadays people either buy a Rega or they spend the wrong side of a thousand pounds. Take a product like a Planar 2 and its RB250 tonearm and form pretty much is function and simplicity is God. Along with the mechanical elegance comes a simple, uncluttered sound and the secret of Rega's success they get the fundamentals right, mechanically and musically. Customers might bitch about the manual speed change, but they just love that accessible and engaging sound. And whilst it might not be quite so obvious, similar concerns dominated Rega's original electronics, the Planet CD player in particular becoming a minor classic. Take a look at those clamshell castings used for the casework, and the minimalist controls and `optional' remotes. Each element has to contribute to the product's value and performance, The problem was that with so much more competition the appearance of the electronics was more of a liability. Lacking the clean aesthetics of the Planar turntables their eclectic looks fell into the love 'em or hate 'em category, which is making life hard for yourself. Also, and in common with most other Rega products, they had already enjoyed a long and healthy shelf life. With the advent of the Planar 25 and the sleek new P3 turntable, they were clearly living on borrowed time, so it was no surprise to hear the announcement of the new 2000 series electronics, and what we have here are two of the central players, the new Planet and Mira models. Well, you can't miss the new casework with its far more conventional appearance. What is less obvious is the thought that's gone into it and the reasoning behind it. Sculpted in two planes it's a far more sophisticated looking beast than the old case. It's also bigger. One of the key pressures on the old die-cast casing was its lack of internal space. The new case is both taller and deeper, allowing Rega to introduce circuit changes that were impossible on the previous models. |
Currently
Available in shops
|
|
|
These revisions bear the hallmarks of considerable thought and consultation. The new aesthetics are far more mainstream than the old, without risking the loss of Rega's individuality, and the overall effect is far more classy. But if the external changes are to be voted a success, then the internals have to stand up sonically as well. You'll be glad to hear that they do, and whilst there's a very definite shift in the sound, its very much a family thing with the characteristics common to both the Planet and Mira, as well as the Brio which I've also played with. So, under the circumstances I'll concentrate on the Planet, as that's where they are most obvious. As regular readers will know, I've been a long term user of the Jupiter and to combination, so it forms a ready benchmark for the Planet. What I wasn't prepared for was the superiority of the cheaper model. The new Planet costs a shade under X500 while the two-box and a Nordost digital interconnect is nearer X1300, but the planet exhibited clear areas of superiority. First generation Rega CD machines were more remarkable for their musical integrity than their detail, and whilst they retained that ability to satisfy long term, it was despite a thickened and relatively low-resolution sound rather than because of it (despite what some aficionados would have you believe ("It sounds much more like my turntable." Strange, I thought it was supposed to sound like music!).
Overall, the result is much greater anticipation as the music scales each height in turn before that last great crescendo and the transition to the woodwinds. The Planet gets the structure and meaning of the piece spot on, as well as the dramatic tension of the performance. In comparison the Jupiter sounds muddled, crude and clumsy. Like I said earlier, the same applies, albeit to a lesser extent, to the Mira. Both these products are significantly more transparent, spatially and musically more coherent, and altogether more sophisticated than the ones they replace. They work beautifully together, and will do so in some surprisingly august company (the Living Voice Avatars for instance) without losing their poise. Take the traditional Rega virtues of structural discipline and rhythmic integrity and graft on additional resolution and information and you end up with something which, whilst it might be less obvious, is ultimately far more satisfying. It will also work better on a wider range of music. I love the old Jupiter/lo combination, but as of now I'm hassling hard for its one-box replacement. In the meantime, the Planet will have to do. Unfamiliar and altogether more chic, musically as well as aesthetically, it's worth getting used to. Come to think of it, that sounds awfully familiar. Who says you can't teach an old guard new tricks? |
||
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Rega
Planet Rega
Mira Rega
Solar Manufacturer: Rega Research Ltd Back to Last Page | Top | Forward to Next Page | Technical Review index |
||